Dismiss Notice
New Cookie Policy
On May 24, 2018, we published revised versions of our Terms and Rules and Cookie Policy. Your use of AstronomyConnect.com’s services is subject to these revised terms.

More Views

Konus KJ-6 60mm Refractor Children Telescope

1.0 (1 Reviews) Read Reviews Write Review
Brand Konus
Part Number
Availability available

Product Info


60mm, FL=900mm refractor on alt-az mount


1.0 (Based on 1 Reviews) 0% of reviewers recommended this product.
Rating Distribution
Sort by
  • Date
  • Rating
  • Useful
    1. calastro

      calastro New Member

      Skill Level
      Time with Product
      User Notes:
      Mar 10, 2008

      1.0 A Cheap Scope for a Cheap Price!


      Decent optics.


      Poor mechanical quality. Not a beginners scope!


      I guess there must be a special place in my heart for 60mm refractors. Or maybe it's just fond memories of the old Tasco that I had nearly 40 years ago. It was quite old then, when I purchased it used, and refurbished it. It was a marvelous performer and I now regret ever getting rid of it. Anyway, when I saw the Konus KJ-6 on an "after Christmas" sale table for for $29, I had to take a chance.

      I new it couldn't be great at that price, but I was impressed that the packaging did not have glaring announcements of high magnification. In fact, upon careful examination, the only place on the packaging where the magnification was even mentioned, was in small print on the back of the box where it stated the magnification with the two supplied eyepieces. OK, I gave them credit for this. It also had the added bonus that it came with an 'over the shoulder' carrying bag for the complete telescope with tripod.

      I had a special use for this scope in mind. I am NASA/JPL Solar System Ambassador. Something that I do quite often, is to work with the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, and with kids from various religious scouting programs, to help them obtain their qualifications for their 'astronomy' and 'sky watching' badges. One common requirement in many instances is for the kids to demonstrate setting up a telescope and then locating objects in the sky with it. For a price of only $29, I figured it wouldn't be that great a loss if the scope got damaged or destroyed. At least it would be far better than having one of my expensive telescopes damaged.

      The good news...

      The optics were actually pretty good. I wasn't expecting much, but the objective is actually pretty decent. The achromatic objective is 60mm diameter with an 800mm fl for a ratio of f/13.33. Sure, chromatic aberration (CA) is there, but it's not very bad. Images of the moon and planets are quite sharp, and open clusters look like they should in a small refractor. Nice small pinpoints of light on a velvety black background. The included diagonal is usable, but not great. Though the casing of the diagonal is plastic, at least it accepts 1 1/4" eyepieces and comes with a .965" adapter.

      The not so good news...

      The rest of the scope is pretty much what I expected. They sure don't make them like they used to! The focuser is all plastic and had a lot of lateral side play. Of course, it also came with the usual dose of the thick grease that's more like glue, and hardens when cold. The focuser draw tube (and therefore the scope side of the diagonal) is .965". The scope comes with two .965" eyepieces, a 20mm Huygens and an 8mm Huygens. Take the 8mm and immediately toss it. It's junk! The 20mm is actually quite usable and gives a nice sharp view of the moon and the planets.

      The finder is small and practically useless. It uses the three screw alignment method, but the quality is horrible. The crosshairs are thick and were off center. The alt/az mount is flimsy and fairly unstable. No matter how hard I tried, I could not seem to get a good adjustment of the mount and keep the telescope balanced. It's just a poor arrangement. The tripod is aluminum and very light.

      Also included is a "moon filter" of rather suspicious quality, and something they are calling a 1.5X erecting eyepiece. It's really just a 1.5X barlow, but it does invert the image and they don't mention using it for astronomical use. It's probably usable for terrestrial use, and that seems to be the way they intended it.

      What I did to improve things...

      The first thing I did was to remove and dismantle the focuser assembly. I carefully removed all traces of the original grease. Upon inspection, it appears that the only shim for the drawtube was a single piece of something like Teflon tape spirally wound in the focuser. This was the primary reason why there was so much lateral play and shift. I carefully cut two additional pieces of "magic" type plastic tape and placed them inside the focuser, one to each side of the original tape. When the drawtube was reinstalled, the fit was much better and there was far less play. I reassembled the focuser giving the rack and pinion a healthy dose of White Graphite grease, and a very tiny amount of the grease on the drawtube. At least now the focuser travel is quite smooth with only slight lateral play.

      The next thing that I noticed was that the the "scope end" of the diagonal tube was unblackened on the inside. I carefully applied a thick coat of flat black paint by brush.

      Not much could be done for the mount except to clean off the old grease, apply some white lithium grease, and carefully adjust the mount for minimal play in the azimuth axis. I then filled the tripod legs with cement to give added weight and stability.


      This definitely is not a scope for a beginner. In its original form, it would discourage almost anyone. There are far better scopes out there for the child or budding beginner that will give far better performance and a better introduction to astronomy.

      For my intended purpose, it has worked out nicely. I would say it's definitely worth the $29 that I paid for it, but not much more. The quick fixes that I made helped, but it should not be expected for a beginner to do these. I wouldn't recommend this scope to anyone, unless you have a special use for it, as I did!

      Bottom Line: Would you recommend this item? No
      Was this review helpful? Yes / No
    Sort by
    • Date
    • Rating
    • Useful